| The nature of feedback: How different types of peer feedback affect writing performance MM Nelson, CD Schunn Instructional science 37, 375-401, 2009 | 845 | 2009 |
| Understanding the benefits of providing peer feedback: How students respond to peers’ texts of varying quality MM Patchan, CD Schunn Instructional Science 43, 591-614, 2015 | 226 | 2015 |
| The nature of feedback: How peer feedback features affect students’ implementation rate and quality of revisions. MM Patchan, CD Schunn, RJ Correnti Journal of Educational Psychology 108 (8), 1098, 2016 | 177 | 2016 |
| Using tablet computers to teach preschool children to write letters: Exploring the impact of extrinsic and intrinsic feedback MM Patchan, CS Puranik Computers & education 102, 128-137, 2016 | 146 | 2016 |
| A validation study of students’ end comments: Comparing comments by students, a writing instructor, and a content instructor MM Patchan, D Charney, CD Schunn Journal of Writing Research 1 (2), 124-152, 2009 | 129 | 2009 |
| Accountability in peer assessment: Examining the effects of reviewing grades on peer ratings and peer feedback MM Patchan, CD Schunn, RJ Clark Studies in Higher Education 43 (12), 2263-2278, 2018 | 111 | 2018 |
| The effects of skill diversity on commenting and revisions MM Patchan, B Hawk, CA Stevens, CD Schunn Instructional Science 41, 381-405, 2013 | 76 | 2013 |
| Understanding the benefits of receiving peer feedback for text revision: Relations between author and reviewer ability MM Patchan, CD Schunn Journal of Writing Research 8 (2), 227-265, 2016 | 49 | 2016 |
| Embedding participatory design into designs for learning: An untapped interdisciplinary resource? E Bonsignore, J Ahn, T Clegg, ML Guha, JP Hourcade, JC Yip, A Druin International Society of the Learning Sciences, 2013 | 46 | 2013 |
| Using peer assisted strategies to teach early writing: Results of a pilot study to examine feasibility and promise CS Puranik, MM Patchan, CJ Lemons, S Al Otaiba Reading and Writing 30, 25-50, 2017 | 40 | 2017 |
| Writing in natural sciences: Understanding the effects of different types of reviewers on the writing process MM Patchan, CD Schunn, RJ Clark The Best of the Independent Rhetoric and Composition Journals 2011, 234, 2013 | 36 | 2013 |
| The effect of blended instruction on accelerated learning MM Patchan, CD Schunn, W Sieg, D McLaughlin Technology, Pedagogy and Education 25 (3), 269-286, 2016 | 34 | 2016 |
| An evaluation of accelerated learning in the CMU Open Learning Initiative course Logic & Proofs CD Schunn, M Patchan Report, Learning Research and Development Center, University of Pittsburgh, 2009 | 29 | 2009 |
| Determining adequate information for green building occupant training materials D Steinberg, M Patchan, C Schunn, A Landis Journal of Green Building 4 (3), 143-150, 2009 | 26 | 2009 |
| Examining alphabet writing fluency in kindergarten: Exploring the issue of time on task CS Puranik, MM Patchan, MM Sears, KL McMaster Assessment for Effective Intervention 42 (2), 81-96, 2017 | 25 | 2017 |
| Developing a focus for green building occupant training materials D Steinberg, M Patchan, C Schunn, A Landis Journal of Green Building 4 (2), 175-184, 2009 | 22 | 2009 |
| Peer review of writing: Learning from revision using peer feedback and reviewing peers' texts MM Patchan University of Pittsburgh, 2011 | 16 | 2011 |
| Using peer assessment to improve middle school mathematical communication MM Patchan, KE Rambo-Hernandez, BN Deitz, J McNeill The Journal of educaTional research 115 (2), 146-160, 2022 | 8 | 2022 |
| Facilitating peer tutoring and assessment in intelligent learning systems RD Roscoe, EA Walker, MM Patchan Tutoring and intelligent tutoring systems, 41-68, 2018 | 8 | 2018 |
| Modeling student evaluations of writing and authors as a function of writing errors R Rod, W Joshua, P Melissa, C Dandan, J Adam Journal of Language and Education 6 (2 (22)), 147-164, 2020 | 7 | 2020 |
Christian SchunnProfessor of Psychology, University of PittsburghVerifisert e-postadresse på pitt.edu