| How many scientists fabricate and falsify research? A systematic review and meta-analysis of survey data D Fanelli PloS one 4 (5), e5738, 2009 | 2362 | 2009 |
| Negative results are disappearing from most disciplines and countries D Fanelli Scientometrics 90 (3), 891-904, 2012 | 1475 | 2012 |
| What does research reproducibility mean? SN Goodman, D Fanelli, JPA Ioannidis Science translational medicine 8 (341), 341ps12-341ps12, 2016 | 1274 | 2016 |
| “Positive” results increase down the hierarchy of the sciences D Fanelli PloS one 5 (4), e10068, 2010 | 943 | 2010 |
| Do pressures to publish increase scientists' bias? An empirical support from US States Data D Fanelli PloS one 5 (4), e10271, 2010 | 942 | 2010 |
| Is science really facing a reproducibility crisis, and do we need it to? D Fanelli Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 115 (11), 2628-2631, 2018 | 502 | 2018 |
| Meta-research: evaluation and improvement of research methods and practices JPA Ioannidis, D Fanelli, DD Dunne, SN Goodman PLoS biology 13 (10), e1002264, 2015 | 458 | 2015 |
| Meta-assessment of bias in science D Fanelli, R Costas, JPA Ioannidis Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 114 (14), 3714-3719, 2017 | 393 | 2017 |
| Misconduct policies, academic culture and career stage, not gender or pressures to publish, affect scientific integrity D Fanelli, R Costas, V Larivière PloS one 10 (6), e0127556, 2015 | 305 | 2015 |
| Why growing retractions are (mostly) a good sign D Fanelli PLoS medicine 10 (12), e1001563, 2013 | 259 | 2013 |
| Data sharing and reanalysis of randomized controlled trials in leading biomedical journals with a full data sharing policy: survey of studies published in The BMJ and PLOS Medicine F Naudet, C Sakarovitch, P Janiaud, I Cristea, D Fanelli, D Moher, ... Bmj 360, 2018 | 222 | 2018 |
| Researchers’ individual publication rate has not increased in a century D Fanelli, V Larivière PloS one 11 (3), e0149504, 2016 | 222 | 2016 |
| Bibliometric evidence for a hierarchy of the sciences D Fanelli, W Glänzel PLoS one 8 (6), e66938, 2013 | 198 | 2013 |
| US studies may overestimate effect sizes in softer research D Fanelli, JPA Ioannidis Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110 (37), 15031-15036, 2013 | 173 | 2013 |
| Scientists admitting to plagiarism: a meta-analysis of surveys V Pupovac, D Fanelli Science and engineering ethics 21, 1331-1352, 2015 | 149 | 2015 |
| Redefine misconduct as distorted reporting D Fanelli Nature 494 (7436), 149-149, 2013 | 117 | 2013 |
| Positive results receive more citations, but only in some disciplines D Fanelli Scientometrics 94 (2), 701-709, 2013 | 95 | 2013 |
| Reproductive constraints, direct fitness and indirect fitness benefits explain helping behaviour in the primitively eusocial wasp, Polistes canadensis S Sumner, H Kelstrup, D Fanelli Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 277 (1688), 1721-1728, 2010 | 56 | 2010 |
| Any publicity is better than none: newspaper coverage increases citations, in the UK more than in Italy D Fanelli Scientometrics 95 (3), 1167-1177, 2013 | 53 | 2013 |
| Testing hypotheses on risk factors for scientific misconduct via matched-control analysis of papers containing problematic image duplications D Fanelli, R Costas, FC Fang, A Casadevall, EM Bik Science and engineering ethics 25, 771-789, 2019 | 50 | 2019 |
John P.A. IoannidisProfessor of Medicine/Health Research & Policy/Biomedical Data Science/Statistics, Stanford Univכתובת אימייל מאומתת בדומיין stanford.edu