Estimating statistical power and required sample sizes for organizational research using multilevel modeling CA Scherbaum, JM Ferreter Organizational Research Methods 12 (2), 347-367, 2009 | 940 | 2009 |
Measuring general self-efficacy: A comparison of three measures using item response theory CA Scherbaum, Y Cohen-Charash, MJ Kern Educational and psychological measurement 66 (6), 1047-1063, 2006 | 787 | 2006 |
Exploring Individual‐Level Factors Related to Employee Energy‐Conservation Behaviors at Work1 CA Scherbaum, PM Popovich, S Finlinson Journal of Applied Social Psychology 38 (3), 818-835, 2008 | 413 | 2008 |
The assessment of attitudes toward individuals with disabilities in the workplace PM Popovich, CA Scherbaum, KL Scherbaum, N Polinko The Journal of Psychology 137 (2), 163-177, 2003 | 170 | 2003 |
A longitudinal examination of the effects of LMX, ability, and differentiation on team performance LJ Naidoo, CA Scherbaum, HW Goldstein, GB Graen Journal of Business and Psychology 26, 347-357, 2011 | 161 | 2011 |
History of research methods in industrial and organizational psychology: Measurement, design, analysis JT Austin, CA Scherbaum, RA Mahlman Handbook of research methods in industrial and organizational psychology, 3-33, 2002 | 135 | 2002 |
Intelligence 2.0: Reestablishing a research program on g in I–O psychology CA Scherbaum, HW Goldstein, KP Yusko, R Ryan, PJ Hanges Industrial and Organizational Psychology 5 (2), 128-148, 2012 | 103 | 2012 |
Applications of item response theory to measurement issues in leadership research CA Scherbaum, S Finlinson, K Barden, K Tamanini The Leadership Quarterly 17 (4), 366-386, 2006 | 91 | 2006 |
Analysing quantitative data for business and management students CA Scherbaum, KM Shockley SAGE Publications Ltd, 2015 | 80 | 2015 |
Synthetic validity: Past, present, and future CA Scherbaum Personnel Psychology 58 (2), 481-515, 2005 | 76 | 2005 |
Testing a computational model of the goal-level effect: An example of a neglected methodology JB Vancouver, DJ Putka, CA Scherbaum Organizational Research Methods 8 (1), 100-127, 2005 | 60 | 2005 |
Validation is like motor oil: Synthetic is better JW Johnson, P Steel, CA Scherbaum, CC Hoffman, PR Jeanneret, ... Industrial and Organizational Psychology 3 (3), 305-328, 2010 | 51 | 2010 |
Do we self-regulate actions or perceptions? A test of two computational models JB Vancouver, CA Scherbaum Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory 14, 1-22, 2008 | 51 | 2008 |
Examining the relationship between organizational change and financial loss LD Mellert, C Scherbaum, J Oliveira, B Wilke Journal of Organizational Change Management 28 (1), 59-71, 2015 | 49 | 2015 |
Identified employee surveys: Potential promise, perils, and professional practice guidelines LM Saari, CA Scherbaum Industrial and Organizational psychology 4 (4), 435-448, 2011 | 48 | 2011 |
Examining the relationship between race-based differential item functioning and item difficulty CA Scherbaum, HW Goldstein Educational and Psychological Measurement 68 (4), 537-553, 2008 | 47 | 2008 |
Manifestations of intelligence: Expanding the measurement space to reconsider specific cognitive abilities CL Reeve, C Scherbaum, H Goldstein Human Resource Management Review 25 (1), 28-37, 2015 | 46 | 2015 |
Predicting Job‐Related Expectancies and Affective Reactions to Employees With Disabilities From Previous Work Experience1 CA Scherbaum, KL Scherbaum, PM Popovich Journal of Applied Social Psychology 35 (5), 889-904, 2005 | 43 | 2005 |
Situational judgment testing: A review and some new developments JK Oostrom, B De Soete, F Lievens Employee recruitment, selection, and assessment, 172-189, 2015 | 39 | 2015 |
If we produce discrepancies, then how? Testing a computational process model of positive goal revision CA Scherbaum, JB Vancouver Journal of Applied Social Psychology 40 (9), 2201-2231, 2010 | 37 | 2010 |