متابعة
Jean-Guy Mailly
Jean-Guy Mailly
IRIT, Université Toulouse Capitole
بريد إلكتروني تم التحقق منه على irit.fr - الصفحة الرئيسية
عنوان
عدد مرات الاقتباسات
عدد مرات الاقتباسات
السنة
On the revision of argumentation systems: Minimal change of arguments statuses.‏
S Coste-Marquis, S Konieczny, JG Mailly, P Marquis‏
KR 14, 52-61, 2014‏
1382014
Extension enforcement in abstract argumentation as an optimization problem.‏
S Coste-Marquis, S Konieczny, JG Mailly, P Marquis‏
IJCAI 15, 2876-2882, 2015‏
892015
Constraints and changes: A survey of abstract argumentation dynamics‏
S Doutre, JG Mailly‏
Argument & Computation 9 (3), 223-248, 2018‏
842018
CoQuiAAS: A constraint-based quick abstract argumentation solver‏
JM Lagniez, E Lonca, JG Mailly‏
2015 IEEE 27th International Conference on Tools with Artificial …, 2015‏
732015
Control argumentation frameworks‏
Y Dimopoulos, JG Mailly, P Moraitis‏
Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence 32 (1), 2018‏
592018
Merging of Abstract Argumentation Frameworks.‏
J Delobelle, A Haret, S Konieczny, JG Mailly, J Rossit, S Woltran‏
KR 2016 (33-42), 7, 2016‏
572016
A translation-based approach for revision of argumentation frameworks‏
S Coste-Marquis, S Konieczny, JG Mailly, P Marquis‏
European Workshop on Logics in Artificial Intelligence, 397-411, 2014‏
502014
Argumentation-based negotiation with incomplete opponent profiles‏
Y Dimopoulos, JG Mailly, P Moraitis‏
13èmes Journées d’Intelligence Artificielle Fondamentale (JIAF 2019), 91-100, 2019‏
412019
Enforcement in formal argumentation‏
R Baumann, S Doutre, JG Mailly, JP Wallner‏
IfColog Journal of Logics and their Applications (FLAP) 8 (6), 1623-1678, 2021‏
272021
Introducing the fourth international competition on computational models of argumentation‏
JM Lagniez, E Lonca, JG Mailly, J Rossit‏
Third International Workshop on Systems and Algorithms for Formal Argumentation, 2020‏
202020
United we stand: Accruals in strength-based argumentation‏
J Rossit, JG Mailly, Y Dimopoulos, P Moraitis‏
Argument & Computation 12 (1), 87-113, 2021‏
192021
Using enthymemes to fill the gap between logical argumentation and revision of abstract argumentation frameworks‏
JG Mailly‏
arXiv preprint arXiv:1603.08789, 2016‏
162016
Yes, no, maybe, I don’t know: Complexity and application of abstract argumentation with incomplete knowledge‏
JG Mailly‏
Argument & Computation 13 (3), 291-324, 2022‏
142022
Design and results of ICCMA 2021‏
JM Lagniez, E Lonca, JG Mailly, J Rossit‏
arXiv preprint arXiv:2109.08884, 2021‏
132021
Constrained incomplete argumentation frameworks‏
JG Mailly‏
Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty: 16th …, 2021‏
132021
Possible controllability of control argumentation frameworks‏
JG Mailly‏
Computational Models of Argument, 283-294, 2020‏
132020
Dynamics of argumentation frameworks‏
JG Mailly‏
Université d'Artois, 2015‏
132015
Stability in abstract argumentation‏
JG Mailly, J Rossit‏
arXiv preprint arXiv:2012.12588, 2020‏
122020
Quantifying the difference between argumentation semantics‏
S Doutre, JG Mailly‏
Computational Models of Argument, 255-262, 2016‏
112016
Semantic change and extension enforcement in abstract argumentation‏
S Doutre, JG Mailly‏
Scalable Uncertainty Management: 11th International Conference, SUM 2017 …, 2017‏
102017
يتعذر على النظام إجراء العملية في الوقت الحالي. عاود المحاولة لاحقًا.
مقالات 1–20